Transitional Linguistics - Are Language Skills Innate?
Some children have innate grammatical abilities that outperform their language skills Photo copyright Janet Cameron |
Is the Human Mind Hardwired with Innate
Rational Knowledge?
Radical philosopher Noam Chomsky, born in
1928, believes that language reveals the nature and the essence of the human
mind through the vehicle of thought. His
views are unpopular with many thinkers, and yet, despite the controversy, most
agree his contribution to the subject has been revolutionary. Chomsky denies
the empiricist view of the mind as a “blank” or “clean” slate, informed by
experience.
According to Chomsky, all languages share a “fundamental universal
grammar, which is hardwired into the human brain.” This grammar does not need to be learned.
Transformational grammar, according to
Chomsky, contains two elements:
The surface structure – this applies to the
specific language spoken or written.
The deep structure – this is hardwired into
the human brain.
Studies of Children “Prove the Rule”
According to Chomsky.
Eventually “transformational grammar”
became known as “transitional linguistics.”
It had been observed by child psychologists that some very young
children develop an ability to apply grammar in advance of their language
skills and Chomsky took this to prove his argument that these did not have to
be learned, because they are innate.
Following on from this came an event weightier concept, that our innate
properties predict and determine everything that we are and know. For Chomsky
there is absolutely no such thing as free will.
Another advocate of the theory is the
psychologist and philosopher, Jerry Fodor who, according to the Internet
Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, claims that "...mental properties are
functional and defined by their role in a cognitive system and not by the
physical material that constitutes them."
He insists, also, that our minds possess innate concepts.
A Notorious Theory, says Steven Pinker
In his book, The Stuff of Thought, Steven
Pinker says, of Fodor: "His
(Fodor's) notorious theory that we are born with some fifty thousand innate
concepts... makes an appearance here, not as a player in the nature/nurture
debate, but a player in the debate over how the meanings of words are
represented in people's minds."
Pinker continues by explaining how Fodor regards words to relate to
"atoms" that cannot be split. The meaning of kill is "kill"
- and not "cause to die." The meanings beneath words are not
assembled of parts. Therefore, Fodor concludes, they must be innate.
According to the Internet Encyclopaedia
of Philosophy: "Fodor has
articulated and defended an alternative, realist conception of intentional
states and their content." The
article continues by explaining Fodor's nativism, which opposes empiricist
theories, arguing that all lexical concepts are innate.
Even here there is a difficulty, since the
term "innate" can mean: a part of one's nature, or hard-wired into
one's mind from the beginning. This, the
article points out, "is reminiscent of Descartes' position that some ideas
are innate, such as the idea of God, of infinity, etc."
http://www.iep.utm.edu/concepts/#SH3e
Harwood, Jeremy, Philosophy – 100 Great
Thinkers, Quercus Publishing Plc, London, 2010.
Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Peer
Reviews
http://www.iep.utm.edu/fodor/
Comments